in relational, political categories and not in the conventional theological categories of self-sufficiency, such as omnipotence, omnipresence, and omniscience, or in private categories of psychological-spiritual inclination. Neither set of such categories expresses the radical historical, relational character of Yahweh. (3) It means that this God is characteristically in profound tension with the other gods, each of which tends to be a legitimator of imperial power of one kind or another. In challenging
Page 57